Sunday, August 16, 2020

Planet X? Why not a tiny black hole instead?

Image of an oddly distorted region of space.

Enlarge (credit: NASA)

Planet X has a long and storied history of non-existence. For about 130 years, astronomers have debated the existence of an additional planet or planets to explain discrepancies in the orbits of the known planets (mainly Neptune and Uranus). Later, the list of discrepancies was expanded to cover trans-Neptunian objects. But none of the Planet X candidates discovered, including Pluto, have the mass or location to explain observations.

Primordial black holes have now been proposed as the latest planet X (or planet 9, since Pluto was demoted).

Orbital weirdness

Planet X’s origin starts with the discovery of Neptune. Neptune was not found by accident: observations of oddities in the orbit of Uranus were used to calculate the location of Neptune, and it was subsequently found.

Read 12 remaining paragraphs | Comments

https://arstechnica.com

No comments:

Post a Comment

A look at "Stanford inside Stanford", where VCs pursue 18- and 19-year-old students, offering mentorship and funding in a bid to convert promise into profit (Theo Baker/The Atlantic)

Theo Baker / The Atlantic : A look at “Stanford inside Stanford”, where VCs pursue 18- and 19-year-old students, offering mentorship and ...